Mythic themes with enduring young charms are made
sometimes deliberately ambiguous, and why? "To
force our contemporary domesticated primates
into performing a most unmammalian task: learning to think for
themselves." So thought-spoke our Mr. R Anton Wilson, co-author of ILLUMINATUS, a sci-fi trilogy.
SITO
THE HIGHER INTELLIGENCE QUIZ
Robert Anton Wilson
1. Do you believe the concept of Higher Intelligence is a useful
concept?
Emphatically. According to Koestler's The Case of the Midwife Toad, mathematical
information theory has demonstrated what many of us long suspected intuitively:
3% billion years is too short a time for pure chance to have produced
the amount of negative entropy (organization) found in the evolutionary script.
Even death-by-senescece (normal "aging") no longer seems stochastic
or random, according to U C Berkeley biologist Paul Segal and others, but
rather appears, like adolescence, a pre-programmed part of the DNA script. I
can hypnotize myself into believing that Spaceship Earth is just a lucky
accident, but when I come out of the hypnosis I am again struck by the
incredible details of intelligent design everywhere, which has historically
"justified" every religion. A search, minus religion and
superstition, for the designers of this planetary drama seems to me a most
profitable scientific venture. "Materialism" so-called is just one
possible theory about matter, and not the most plausible theory by any means.
Gurdjieff and the pioneer 19th Century 'Spiritualists were
"materialists" without limiting themselves to the most dismal
mechanistic theories about matter. Einstein's matter-energy equations, Reich's
orgonomic functionalism, the direct experience (as distinguished from the dogma)
of 30,000 years of shamanic-yogic investigators, LSD research, plant-human
telepathy in the wake of Backster's Effect (Secret Life of Plants, Bird,
Tompkins), etc., all converge around something close to pantheism (or, at
minimum, Transcendental Materialism) rather than the clockwork mechanism of
19th Century dogma.
2. How would you define Higher Intelligence?
As in mathematics, "higher" must
imply higher order, i.e. more inclusivity and complexity. Structure
being multi-ordinal, Higher Intelligence would be revealed by relating to,
involving oneself with, communicating to, levels of structure (in space-time)
still invisible (unpredictable) to lower intelligence.
3. How would you define intelligence?
Intelligence is manifested by the reception,
accurate decoding and transmission of. energy. Consciousness is manifested by
mere reception of energy. Expansion of consciousness (psychedelic or
metaprogramming experience) is dilation of neural reception to ingest more
energy; escalation of intelligence is accurate decoding of the new energies so
received. Aleister Crowley's formula for the traditional Illuminati goal of
"Perfect Wisdom and True Happiness" was "! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? !
?," an endless series of expansions (symbolized by ! ) in alteration with
integrations (symbolized by ? ). Pure consciousness, Oriental Samadhi, is
pure expansion ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ), and might be called the highest or most
benign form of stupidity.
4. It has been said that the human brain is an instrument which
humanity does not understand how to use. Comment.
The human brain, like Spaceship Earth, came without an operating
manual. The designers evidently intended us to write our own manuals.
5. Do you believe that the wide variations in human intelligence are due to
differences in neural wiring (i.e. genetic) or due to social-educational
differences? Or both?
This remains to be discovered.
Temperamentally, as a non-dualist, I tend to suspect that the answer will be
"both," but the evidence to date is silly-putty and can be molded to
fit anybody's racist or behaviorist theory. The historically dreadful
consequences of racist theory should not prevent us from thinking objectively
about the matter, however. See below.
6. Do you think that neural differences among
individuals or racial groups define different sub-species?
Only if one wants to use that semantics.
Evolution seems to proceed by variation and self- selection, not by uniformity;
therefore, every difference makes a difference, i.e. has a function. The most
idiotic form of racism (or sexism) is the attempt to abolish differences. The
Hermetic maxim, "God hath need of every human soul," can be
translated into modern language as "Evolution hath need of every
deviation. "
7. Do you think that the very
concept of intelligence or differences in intelligence is elitist or
anti-democratic?
No way. Despite my rejection of Pure Chance
as a panchreston (an attempt to explain everything), I recognize that hazard
exists. The DNA script provides for variation (deviation, ever
"perversion" if you feel that way about it) in order to provide for
contingency. The great teachers who wrote the fairy tales arrange for the Fool
or the "inferior" third brother to marry the Princess at the end;
they were teaching a lesson that racists and fanatic eugenicists still haven't
learned. Penalizing differences (as in institutionalized racism, sexism,
classism, casteism, etc.) and attempting to abolish differences (as in anthill
socialism) miss the whole point of evolutionary variation. Genes are passed on
one by one at random; therefore, Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of
the law.
Or, as Blake said, "One law for the Lion
and the Ox is Tyranny."
8. The average IQ. (however measured) is
assigned the index of 100. This means half of the population is below IQ 100,
i.e. just barely literate. What are the implications of these statistics?
Authoritarian society (class-caste games) has
been a fact for several milleniums. This discourages the intelligence of those
assigned the serf or slave positions. Anything they see, hear, smell, taste,
guess, intuit, reason out, etc., is irrelevant and immaterial to the ruling
elite. The rulers therefore bear a burden of omniscience as they attempt
to do all the seeing, hearing, smelling, thinking, etc., for the whole society;
and the proles bear an equal and opposite burden of nescience as they
are conditioned to ignore their own seeings, hearings, thinkings, etc., and act
only on orders from above. Communication is only possible between equals, and
thus both rulers and serfs gradually develop a progressive group
disorientation. Unwelcome information usually results in burning at the stake,
the rack, the Iron Boot, confinement in a cage, or whatever form of torture is
locally known as "enlightened modern penology" in the given society.
The ruling elite thus being armed and dangerous, they only hear what suits
their previous beliefs. SNAFU is the norm in any authoritarian pyramid, not
just in the Army. (For more on the burden of nescience, see Dumb Blondes, Uncle
Tomism among blacks, Good Soldier Schweikism, etc. For burden of omniscience,
see Nixon, Richard,
career of.)
9. Do you think that a level of intelligence
exists that is as to the human as the human is to the ape's?
I feel sure that many such levels exist.
10. If so, in what form does it exist?
Many forms. Every unusual perception
(expansion of consciousness to ingest new energy structures) is apt to be
classified as "hallucination" by skeptics, including the investigator
him/her/self if he/she retains intelligent skepticism. Nonetheless, after
twelve years of experiment with shamanic, yogic, Sufic, and more recent
techniques, I believe some of my contacts with Higher Intelligences, roughly
corresponding to the "angels" and "archangels" of
Cabalistic-Sufic tradition. Like Dr. John Lilly, I have wondered if They are
time-travelers from the future, very advanced human adepts now on earth helping
other students along the Path, extraterrestrials, or something else. Like Dr.
Leary, I tend strongly to suspect They are extraterrestrials. Like Dr. Jacques
Vallee, I conjecture that They might be beyond any thought-form or category we
have yet invented. On my own, I have fantasized that They might be the giant
whales or dolphins, whose enormous brains must be doing something
non-mechanical, since they lack hands for human-style technology.
11. Do you think Higher Intelligence exists
on other star systems in the galaxy?
Intuitively, yes. My experience of the life-mind
or genetic unconscious seems to correlate with the theory that life is
omnipresent, rather than with the theory that life is accidental and rare. If
omni-present, it must statistically exist in many higher forms throughout
space-time, as well as in many lower forms.
12. What are the chances of our contacting
Higher Intelligence in your lifetime?
Excellent. It seems increasingly plausible to
me that certain specially-trained individuals have been making such contacts
for 30,000 years now, and that this underlies the "allies,"
"gods," "angels," "fairy folk,"
"devas," etc., of the various occult traditions. That is, "hallucination"
explains many, but not all, of such contacts.
13. Do you consider DNA as an intelligent
entity? Why?
Yes. Because .the data of psychedelic
research, Jungian psychology and history of religion and magick all make sense
with this assumption, and don't make sense otherwise. For instance, it is
easier for me to believe that Socrates' "daemon" and Jesus'
"Father" were real experiences than to assume that Socrates and Jesus
were half-crazy. The experience of Higher Intelligence within is as common
among investigators of consciousness as the experience of Higher Intelligence
without.
14. Do you consider the nucleus of the atom
as an intelligent entity?
Yes. Because it increasingly makes sense to
me to assume that life and intelligence are omni-present and multi-ordinal.
15. Do you believe humanity will evolve to a
higher level of intelligence?
It always has. I assume it always will. More
specifically, the intersection of Greek logic-and-dialectic, from the monkish
class, and craft technique-and-empiricism, from the medieval guilds, produced
modern science, or logical empiricism, the most revolutionary force in
history, which has (in 300 years) transformed the planet more than all previous
evolution. The intersection of modern science and traditional shamanic-yogic
arts, via the psychedelic revolution and the blossoming of parapsychology, will
produce a higher synergetic product, even more revolutionary.
16. If so what form will this take?
We are graduating from miserable terrestrial
mortality into ecstatic cosmic immortality; from robots into self-aware
entities; from earth to the stars. The "wild talents" of saints and
shamans will become subject to conscious control. Brain-change, immortality,
and Space Migration will change our philosophies more radically than the impacts
of Copernicus, Darwin, or Freud.
17. Do you think intelligence can be raised?
Sure. Americans being less paranoid about
machines than about chemicals, it will happen chiefly through bio-feedback, not
through LSD, at least in this part of the world. But it will happen.
18. Do you believe that the raising of
intelligence levels should be defined as a national priority project comparable
to raising the level of energy resources?
Yea, verily! Energy can neither be created
nor destroyed; as Buckminster Fuller quite correctly insists, there is never a
real energy shortage, but only a technique shortage, i.e. an intelligence
shortage. Indeed, authoritarian society, the Coercive State, wedded to an
omniscience-burdened ruling elite and a nescience-burdened slave-serf class,
represents a perpetual intelligence shortage, or as I elsewhere call it, a
Snafu Principle.
A sane world would get logic, semantics,
scientific METHOD, and bio-feedback into the grade schools; retire every worker
who can possibly be replaced by a machine; start retooling to replace all the
other workers by machines (since UNEMPLOYMENT SHOULD NOT BE CURED, NOT BEING A
DISEASE: it IS the cure); establish a guaranteed annual income to replace the
idiot Welfare system; stop persecuting original thinking; end the dinosaur arms
race, putting the credit-energy into Space Migration, Immortality research, and
Neurologic. It is time we stopped operating like Permian reptiles and
synergetically combine for Extraterrestrial Immortality. What other game is
worth our time?